It’s time for Dallas to put the Methodist Hospital fitness center zoning battle to bed


Several many years back, thanks to my predecessor on the Dallas Metropolis Council, Scott Griggs, I experienced the option to serve the city and north Oak Cliff on the Dallas City Strategy Fee. Throughout that phrase of services, a person zoning situation induced extra heartache and division for north Oak Cliff than all other folks merged: the Methodist Dallas Health care Heart zoning issue.

The strategy itself was noble and enjoyable, to create a condition-of-the-art fitness middle on Methodist’s campus. But Methodist and lots of neighbors who lived appropriate up up coming to the campus could not occur jointly on the site for the new centre.

The proposal, which necessary a zoning improve for Methodist to make the middle in committed no-construct inexperienced house, would have resulted in the loss of a lot of recognized pecan trees and a buffer amongst the community and the healthcare facility. And Methodist did not have the cash or motivation at that time to establish the heart in an additional place.

The division in East Kessler Park about this situation, which pitted neighbor towards neighbor, went on for months, culminating in broadly publicized and attended Plan Fee and City Council hearings.

In a predicament where by a lot more than 20% of the suitable property owners who reside around a zoning subject file appropriate created protests, the Regional Authorities Code necessitates that the proposed zoning alter acquire the affirmative vote of at the very least three-fourths of the City Council in buy to move.

At the council amount, a lot drama ensued all-around a “technical issue” of one particular affidavit that created all the variance to the quantity of needed votes. The council’s final conclusion to throw out this singular opposition affidavit and pass the zoning case towards council member Griggs’ and neighbors’ objections has led to many years of litigation.

Neighbors, who ended up led by long-time advocate Katherine Homan and appalled by Town Council’s refusal to adhere to Dallas Advancement Code rules at the listening to, appealed the council’s determination to district courtroom.

They sought a declaratory judgment from the metropolis, Methodist and a town setting up official in a accommodate that reported the “zoning amendment was invalid since a three-fourths the greater part had not voted for its acceptance.”

The city and Methodist submitted defensive claims, and community leader Homan also submitted a movement for summary judgment. Following a hearing, the demo court docket dismissed statements from Methodist. But the court docket denied the city’s plea and granted Homan’s summary judgment. The courtroom entered a last judgment awarding Homan declaratory relief and attorney’s expenses.

Methodist has moved on and has been functioning hand-in-hand with East Kessler Park to mend the wounds brought about by this litigation. But the metropolis, inspired by the city attorney’s office, selected to charm the district court’s judgment very last yr, continuing to twist the knife of division in the north Oak Cliff neighborhood.

And the moment once again, the metropolis was slapped down by a court, this time by the Court docket of Appeals for the 5th District of Texas. Now that two courts have chastised the city for ignoring its very own codes, it’s time for the town to enable East Kessler Park and Methodist comprehensive their therapeutic process by putting this product to mattress.

I inspire the metropolis to stop the litigation and pay the attorney’s costs asked for by neighbors.

Chad West is a member of the Dallas City Council. He wrote this column for The Dallas Morning News.

Leave a Reply